Global Financial Watchdogs Tighten AI Oversight to Manage Systemic Risk
As AI adoption floods into banking and finance, global regulatory bodies are moving to bring artificial intelligence under closer supervision. The Financial Stability Board and central bank watchdogs are warning that consolidation in AI models and hardware supply chains could amplify systemic vulnerabilities.
DAte
Oct 10, 2025
Category
Technology & AI
Reading Time
5–6 Minutes
On October 10, 2025, Reuters reported that global financial regulators are planning enhanced oversight of AI systems used in banking, investing, and financial infrastructure.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) warned that if many institutions adopt the same AI models and rely on shared hardware, “herd-like behavior” could lead to cascading risk exposure. The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) added regulators need to upgrade their capabilities both as observers and users of AI to stay ahead of associated threats.
Regulators note that while AI offers productivity gains, it also introduces risks: model failure, cyberattacks, data poisoning, and amplified market stress if many players react to the same signals. Also, overreliance on a few dominant models or vendors could create single points of failure.
The report aligns with ongoing efforts: the European Union’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) is already in force, mandating operational controls for financial entities. The new push suggests regulators worldwide want stronger guardrails before AI becomes too embedded without governance.
Key Highlights
Global regulators to escalate monitoring of AI use in finance.
FSB warns of risks if many players rely on identical AI models & hardware.
BIS highlights the need for regulators to adopt AI themselves to stay relevant.
AI-related financial risks include cyberattacks, model misbehavior, correlated market shocks.
DORA in the EU already sets a regulatory baseline; the new push may extend globally.
Why This Matters
Systemic Safeguards: Without oversight, a failure in a dominant model could propagate across the global financial system.
Model & Vendor Risks: Concentration in technology (few models, few vendors) creates potential chokepoints.
Regulator Preparedness: Regulators need AI expertise to understand, audit, and respond when things go wrong.
Preemptive Governance: Better to embed controls now than attempt to patch regulatory gaps after a crisis or failure.
Source
Reuters – Full Article
Author
